Attitude Of Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan Special Teachers Towards Inclusion Of The Children With Divyangjan In Nagpur
Keywords:Divyangjan - Intellectual disability, Inclusion, Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan (SSA),, inclusive teachers, general teachers, children with Divyangjan
The rationale of the study is to analyze the “Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan Special Teachers attitude towards Inclusion of the Children with Divyangjan in Nagpur. The study is a descriptive research design used by survey method. The views of inclusive teachers in the areas of attitude towards concept of Inclusion, attitude towards strategies to improve Inclusion and attitude towards collaboration between inclusive teachers and regular teachers. The sample size of the study was 100 inclusive teachers' (male 50 and female 50), from Government schools working in Block Resource Centre under SSA, Nagpur. The results showed that there is no significance difference among the inclusive teachers towards Inclusion of the children with Divyangjan with respect to age, gender, educational qualifications and teaching experiences. Age, Hence the researcher has been rejected the hypotheses at 0.05 levels. As the study shows that attitude of inclusive teachers towards Inclusion of the children with Divyangjan was highly positive.
Bowman, P. T. (1986) Instructional strategies in main stream classrooms; prediction of the strategies teachers selects. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 23-30.
Colin, T. (2004) The search for a model of effective inclusive practice through the Inclusive School. British Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 42-45.
Cornoldi, Cesare, Terreni, Aiessandra, Scruggs, Thomas E. (1998) Teachers attitudes in Italy after twenty years of inclusion. Remedial and special Education, vol.19, No.6, pp.350-56.
Guido, D. L. (1990). Educators' attitude towards the inclusion of severely profoundly Disabled students in Regular classrooms. Dessertation Abstract International, volume (51), No, 10.
Hoffman, M. A. Hale (1997) An Analysis of Inclusion in New Jersey school Districts (General Education Teachers). Dissertation Abstract International, A 58 / 05, pp.1658.
International League of Societies for Mentally Health (1999), http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn- n50062183/
Fox, N. E and Ysseidyke, J. E. (1997) Implementing inclusion at the middle school level; Lessons from a negative example, Exceptional children, 64, 81-98.
McBrayer, P. & Fory, K. (1998) Integrating students with disabilities in Hong Kong: classroom Teachers attitudes and beliefs, Journal of International special needs education, volume p.7 - 11.
Minke, K. M., Bear, G. G., Deemer, S. A and Griffin, S. M. (1996) Teachers experiences with inclusive classrooms: Implications for special education reform. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 152-186.
Paul, T. S., Deirdre, K. S., Diane, Y. H. and Todd, W. L. (2006) The sustainability of Inclusive School Reform. Exceptional Children, 72, 317-320.
Praisner, C. L. (2003) Attitudes of Elementary school principals towards the Inclusion of students with Disabilities. Exceptional children, volume 69, No. 2.
Rane, N. (1983) A theoretical frame work for understanding loss and the helping process. In R. Weston, T.Martin and Y.Anderson (Eds.). Loss and bereavement: Managing change, London.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A. (1996) Quantitative synthesis of Survey research literature: Methodology and Validation. In T.E. Scruggs and M.A. Mastropieri (Eds.) Advances in learning and behavioural disabilities; Theoretical percepectives, IOA. Greenwich, CT; JAI, PP.209- 283.
Soodak, L. C., Podell, D. M. & Lehman, L. R. (1998) Teacher, student and school attributes as predictors of teachers' responses to inclusion. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 480¬497.
Verma & Verma, (1974) Inservice A mandated special education course and its effects on regular classroom teachers. Teacher Education and special Education. Educational, 8 (2), 59¬65.
York, J. & Tundidor, M. (1995) Issues raised in the name of inclusion: Perspectives of educators, parents and students. Journal of the Association for persons with severe Handicapped, 20, 31-44.